There are a few widely used business models out there today employed by web applications designed to get users to 'try before you buy' the product. The two that come to mind most are:
- Freemium - offer a scaled back version of a product with limited functionality - when users want to make use of higher-order functionality, they can choose to pay for the premium version of the product
- This is great for incumbent companies, as it basically gives away a low-level version of the product which in some ways 'fends off' or 'crowds out' smaller startups that might start with basic functionality and build more stuff on later
- Examples of this include: TurboTax, Pandora, Flickr, Skype, LinkedIn
- Time-based trial - offer your product with full features for a set period of time (e.g. 30 days)
- This a nice way to show off all the bells and whistles of your product and get the user hooked. The issue here is that the time based approach may not give the user enough time to try it out and fully give it a test spin... maybe they don't get to it in that first 30 days?
- Examples of this include: Basecamp (37 signals), Apple's iWork... many others
- The giveaway - Sometimes companies simply give away credit to their services - example Google Adwords... they love to give away $100 or $200 of free advertising.. great model.
Action Method employed a unique approach in that they let me use the full functionality of the product, but cutoff my use not based on time, but rather based on usage! This makes a tonne of sense, because in a way, once you set a 'usage' limit, it ensures that users have taken full advantage of the product and gotten hooked. I didn't feel any time pressure to use the product and instead just tried it out risk free. This type of upsell I refer to as 'Usage-based trial' and I hope it gets applied more broadly.
Of course, each of these models has their merits depending upon the actual product being sold - you always need to balance giving your users a chance to try the product with simply giving away your product that you should rightfully be charging for!
Best of luck!
1984

